From the President: Once Upon a Time in Missouri

The following is a letter from MRL President Pam Fichter which appeared in our October Newsletter:

During the special session, both the Missouri Senate and the House passed The Missouri Science Innovation and Reinvestment Act (MOSIRA) with bi-partisan majorities. This legislation provides public money for life science research without effective language to prevent funding of abortion-related services, human cloning, or embryonic stem cell research (ESCR). Missouri Right to Life (MRL) promoted protective language at every step of the process in every way we could with the help of many courageous legislators. But when the final vote was taken, the majority of legislators from both parties didn’t feel the one sentence supported by MRL – or any other language that would effectively prevent the public funding of unethical research – was important enough to include. This current legislature deserves great credit for passing restrictions on late-term abortions during the regular session, but abortion isn’t the only life issue of concern to prolife voters of Missouri. Many of you may be asking yourselves what happened to our pro-life legislators on the issues of cloning and embryonic stem cell research.

Supporters of unethical research have invested tremendous sums of money in promoting their cause to the legislators. While tracking money in politics is like following water downhill, a review of the reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission just before and since the 2006 passage of Amendment 2 reveals that hundreds of thousands of dollars have been donated to legislators by pro-cloning PAC’s. MRL has identified at least three pro-cloning PAC’s: Supporters of Health Research and Treatment, The Greater K.C. Chamber of Commerce, which spun off a specific procloning PAC called The Life Sciences of Greater K.C. Chamber. There could be additional pro-cloning groups making donations to legislators of which we’re currently unaware.

But the pro-cloning money is only one possible answer to the defection of pro-life support on the issue of cloning and embryonic stem cell research in the Missouri Legislature. The decline of the economy nationwide and in Missouri – and the desire of many legislators to improve economic conditions in Missouri – led many of them to put aside pro-life concerns if doing otherwise was perceived to imperil economic development. This false choice was promoted by the pro-cloning lobbyists, particularly MOBIO, a leading advocate of unrestricted research and of Amendment 2.

Another component in the MOSIRA vote was the weak response from groups who were former allies in the battle to defeat Amendment 2. With the exception of The Missouri Roundtable for Life, Concerned Women for America, and Eagle Forum, other groups actually supported parts or all of the economic development legislation for the desired tax credits they contained, supported ineffective reporting language, or had an extremely weak response to the threat against human life.

While the MOSIRA vote was a great disappointment, we cannot be discouraged from continuing to be a voice for life. We know that we are called not to be victorious, but to be faithful. Once upon a time, Missouri had a solid legislative pro-life majority willing to uphold those principles on all life issues. With the prayers and the votes of pro-life Missouri citizens, we can be that state once again.

“Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labour in the Lord is not in vain.”
1 Corinthians 15:5

Blessings,
Pam Fichter

Missouri Right to Life July Newsletter

The July MRL Newsletter is now available online. Included in this issue:

2010 LEGISLATIVE WRAP **

MRL – PAC Committee Endorsement Criteria

Missouri Right to Life PAC Candidate Ratings and Endorsements Primary Election — August 3, 2010
———–
**Update: Since Governor Nixon has allowed SB 793 to become law, there is no need for a veto override effort on September 15. Instead, take the time to write a thank you note to Governor Nixon for allowing SB 793 to become law. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Room 216, State Capitol, Jefferson City, MO 65101. Email address click here

News, Articles and Important Updates from MRL Newsletter

The Missouri Right to Life February newsletter is now available online. A few highlights:

    Ultrasounds Save Lives, Protect Women
    (Page 1)

Missouri is a state that has some of the most wonderful pro-life resources in the nation. Counted among them are over sixty pregnancy resource centers that provide multiple services to women in crisis pregnancy situations who are feeling unsure, scared, pressured, or alone. And significant among those are the ones that offer ultrasound services to these women. Article on front page of linked document below.

    Pro-Life Action Day
    (Page 4)

In the ongoing struggle to give women a real “choice,” the use of ultrasound helps ensure that mothers in crisis pregnancies make truly informed decisions. Several states have laws requiring an abortion provider to give a mother an opportunity to view an ultrasound prior to undergoing an abortion. The women of Missouri deserve the same care. Flyer on page 4 of linked document below.

    Stand Up for Life Student Action Day
    (Page 5)

At the upcoming legislative action day, on March 30th, we will also be conducting a workshop for high school students. This is an opportunity for students to learn more about the legislative process in their state capitol, put their faith into citizen action and learn about the pro-life issue.

    National Cancer Institute researcher reverses position, finally admits abortion raises breast cancer risk
    (Page 8 )

An April 2009 study by Jessica Dolle et al. of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center examining the relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in women under age 45 contained an admission from U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) researcher Louise Brinton and her colleagues (including Janet Daling) that abortion raises breast cancer risk by 40%. Article on page 8 of linked document below.

    Proceed Cautiously When Funding New Technologies
    Definitions can help protect life or can promote unethical practices
    David Prentice, Ph.D.
    (Page 9)

Science and technology keep bringing us exciting new discoveries. Hardly a
day goes by without a news story of the latest breakthrough, and promises of
wonderful outcomes. But when funding initiatives in science and technology, taxpayers need to pay attention to how new technologies are defined, and whether protections for all human life are incorporated.

Download now and become an MRL member to receive our newsletter in the mail!

October Newsletter Now Available

Please check out this month’s MRL Newsletter and help us keep Missourians up-to-date on all pro-life issues with your generous donation!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.